Post by firoj1414 on Feb 14, 2024 4:50:09 GMT -5
The International Court in The Hague in the Netherlands has determined that it has jurisdiction to rule on Ukraine's request to be exonerated from responsibility for genocide. However, in other aspects of the Ukrainian case, the court has no jurisdiction. On numerous occasions, Russia and Ukraine have accused each other of committing genocide. Almost two years ago, Ukraine brought its case to the International Court of Justice alleging that Moscow raised false claims of genocide to justify its invasion. The lawsuit was filed in March 2022, shortly after the start of the Russian invasion. However, the court has indicated that it cannot rule on this particular matter. Instead, it will rule on whether Ukraine violated the convention, as Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed to justify the invasion. The final ruling, which will be legally binding, could take several years to be issuedPresident Joan.
Donoghue stated that although Russia has maliciously accused Ukraine of committing genocide and taken action against it under that pretext, this would not, in itself, constitute a violation of international obligations. established in the genocide convention. The court has also concluded that it has no jurisdiction to decide whether the Russian invasion violated the 1948 genocide convention Israel Email List or whether Moscow's recognition of two breakaway republics in eastern Ukraine constitutes a violation of that convention. Although Moscow argued last year that Ukraine's case should be dismissed before analyzing the merits of kyiv's complaints the panel will continue with the process. During hearings in September, the head of Moscow's legal team, Gennady Kuzmin, called the Ukraine case "hopelessly flawed and contrary to the long-standing jurisprudence of this court.
For the court to have jurisdiction, Ukraine had to prove that there is a dispute with Russia over the genocide convention. A member of Moscow's legal team, Sienho Lee, told judges in September that Russia had not used the genocide convention to justify its military actions in Ukraine, which are based on the right of self-determination and its inherent right to self-defense. . During the same hearings, Ukraine insisted that the court has jurisdiction and criticized Moscow for openly flouting the court's interim order to halt the invasion. In March 2022, the court ordered Russia to cease military operations in Ukraine while the legal process played out in the first weeks of the war.specific allocation to keep 100% of the funds . This opens a new source of conflict with the governors who do not want to lose 30% of the resources for works. But in addition to that, the idea that began to circulate is to convert it into a co-participatory tax.
Donoghue stated that although Russia has maliciously accused Ukraine of committing genocide and taken action against it under that pretext, this would not, in itself, constitute a violation of international obligations. established in the genocide convention. The court has also concluded that it has no jurisdiction to decide whether the Russian invasion violated the 1948 genocide convention Israel Email List or whether Moscow's recognition of two breakaway republics in eastern Ukraine constitutes a violation of that convention. Although Moscow argued last year that Ukraine's case should be dismissed before analyzing the merits of kyiv's complaints the panel will continue with the process. During hearings in September, the head of Moscow's legal team, Gennady Kuzmin, called the Ukraine case "hopelessly flawed and contrary to the long-standing jurisprudence of this court.
For the court to have jurisdiction, Ukraine had to prove that there is a dispute with Russia over the genocide convention. A member of Moscow's legal team, Sienho Lee, told judges in September that Russia had not used the genocide convention to justify its military actions in Ukraine, which are based on the right of self-determination and its inherent right to self-defense. . During the same hearings, Ukraine insisted that the court has jurisdiction and criticized Moscow for openly flouting the court's interim order to halt the invasion. In March 2022, the court ordered Russia to cease military operations in Ukraine while the legal process played out in the first weeks of the war.specific allocation to keep 100% of the funds . This opens a new source of conflict with the governors who do not want to lose 30% of the resources for works. But in addition to that, the idea that began to circulate is to convert it into a co-participatory tax.